Bittensor subnet scoring: ICM Analytics tracks 129+ Bittensor subnets with a proprietary Master Score combining market dynamics (35%), GitHub development signals (40%), and AI-driven fundamental analysis (25%). Updated daily via automated pipeline.

How scores work: Each subnet receives a Market Score (price, volume, liquidity, staking), GitHub Score (commits, PRs, releases, code quality), and AI Score (usefulness, adoption, code quality, ship speed). These combine into a 0-100 Master Score with letter ratings (S ≥ 80, A ≥ 65, B ≥ 50). Higher scores indicate stronger multi-dimensional momentum.

Data by ICM Analytics — Bittensor subnet intelligence powered by TaoStats ingestion, GitHub scanning, and LLM analysis. Updated daily.

TAO Price
Loading...
Market Cap
Circulating
24h Volume
USD Notional
FDV
21M max supply
Active Accounts
On-chain
Circulating Supply
TAO

Loading network data...

TAO Price Chart

TAO / USDT — Price Chart

Open on TradingView →

Why Momentum Matters in dTAO

The structural feedback loop that drives subnet performance

The dTAO Momentum Flywheel

Unlike traditional markets, dTAO has a built-in mechanism that amplifies momentum. Capital allocation directly influences a subnet's economic capacity, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that makes momentum both predictable and persistent.

Capital Inflows
Stakers allocate TAO
Higher Emissions
More TAO/block rewards
Dev Spending
Fund development & mining
Activity & Attention
Community & awareness
More Inflows
Cycle repeats

Scoring Methodology

Three pillars combine into a single Master Score per subnet

📈

Market Score

Volatility-adjusted price dynamics, trading volume, liquidity depth, alpha staking flows, and emission share. Captures how capital is moving into or out of a subnet.

0 – 100 • Weight: 35%
💻

GitHub Score

Commit cadence & momentum trend (30d vs 90d), merged PRs, release velocity, PR review depth (avg reviews + self-merge ratio), commit message quality (conventional commits %), dependency management (Dependabot/Renovate), CI/tests/lint/docs depth, and bus factor (contributor concentration risk).

0 – 100 • Weight: 40%
🧠

AI Score

LLM-driven analysis scoring all four dimensions independently: Usefulness (real-world utility & durability), Code Quality (engineering rigor), Adoption (community traction & bus factor), Ship Speed (velocity & momentum). Blended 60/40 with heuristic signals for each dimension.

0 – 100 • Weight: 25%

Master Score

Weighted composite: Market (35%) + GitHub (40%) + AI (25%). Produces a letter rating: S (exceptional), A (strong), B (good), C (below average). GitHub development quality carries the most weight.

0 – 100 • S ≥ 80 • A ≥ 65 • B ≥ 50 • C < 50

Top Subnets by Master Score

Ranked by combined market, GitHub, and AI momentum signals

Subnet Spotlight

Deep dive into top-performing subnets

How To Use This Data

Interpreting subnet scores for staking and delegation decisions

Reading the Scores

The Master Score is not a buy/sell signal — it's a momentum indicator that helps you understand which subnets have the strongest multi-dimensional signals at any given time. Here's how to interpret each component:

  • High Market + Low GitHub: Price momentum without development backing. Could be speculative — proceed with caution.
  • High GitHub + Low Market: Strong development activity that the market hasn't priced in yet. Potential opportunity if fundamentals hold.
  • High AI Score + Low Market: The LLM analysis sees strong usefulness and adoption potential, but capital hasn't followed. May indicate early-stage or undiscovered subnet.
  • All three high (S-rated): Strong consensus across market, development, and AI analysis. These subnets have the most robust momentum profiles.
  • Declining Master Score: Momentum is fading — could signal capital rotation, development slowdown, or narrative exhaustion.

From Momentum to Action

Traditional momentum investing suggests buying winners and avoiding losers over short-to-medium timeframes. In dTAO, this translates to:

  • Staking allocation: Weight toward higher Master Score subnets for emission capture
  • Rebalancing: Review allocations when scores shift by >10 points in either direction
  • Risk management: Diversify across 5-8 subnets rather than concentrating in the top 1-2
  • Time horizon: Momentum signals are most informative over 3-10 day windows, per academic research on dTAO markets
← Back to Home