What is Bittensor subnet 64 (Chutes)?

Chutes (SN64) is Breakthrough Serverless Compute for AI, At Scale. It is one of 129 active subnets on the Bittensor network, scored daily by ICM Analytics across market dynamics, GitHub development, and AI fundamentals.

What is the Master Score for Chutes (SN64)?

Chutes currently holds a Master Score of 44/100 (rating: C). The score combines Market Score (35%), GitHub Score (40%), and AI Score (25%). Higher scores indicate stronger multi-dimensional momentum.

Is Chutes (SN64) a good Bittensor subnet to stake?

ICM Analytics tracks Chutes (SN64) with a composite Master Score of 44/100. Consider market momentum, GitHub activity, and AI usefulness scores together. Visit the full scorecard at https://icm-analytics.com/bittensor/subnets/64/ for current evidence and scoring breakdown. This is not financial advice.

Chutes

Name: Chutes (SN64) — Bittensor Subnet Intelligence
Creator: ICM Analytics
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

SN64 · ش

Breakthrough Serverless Compute for AI, At Scale.

Master Score

Price

—

Market cap

—

24h Volume

—

Network

—

Last commit

—

Why this score

Strengths

Risks

Score breakdown

Master score history — 30d

Price history

Social intelligence

Repo health

Frequently Asked Questions

: Chutes (SN64) is Breakthrough Serverless Compute for AI, At Scale. It is part of the Bittensor decentralized AI network, scored daily by ICM Analytics across market dynamics, GitHub development activity, and AI fundamentals.
: Chutes holds a Master Score of 44/100 (rating: C). This combines Market Score (35%), GitHub Score (40%), and AI Score (25%). Scores above 65 indicate strong multi-dimensional momentum.
: ICM Analytics updates Chutes's scores daily from TaoStats market data, GitHub API development signals, and LLM-driven AI analysis. Score history and evidence are displayed in the scorecard above.

Data sourced from TaoStats (market data), GitHub API (development signals), and proprietary LLM analysis (AI score). Updated daily. Scoring methodology →